Skip to Navigation

Bookmark and Share

People Per Representative

Population: Census 2008 divided by # of US Representatives

Created by: nbucknor
Categories:

Your rating: None Average: 3.9 (40 votes)

RankRegionPopulation: Census 2008÷# of US RepresentativesResult
1Montana967,440.00÷1.00967,440.00
2Utah2,736,424.00÷3.00912,141.33
3Delaware873,092.00÷1.00873,092.00
4Nevada2,600,167.00÷3.00866,722.33
5Arizona6,500,180.00÷8.00812,522.50
6South Dakota804,194.00÷1.00804,194.00
7Idaho1,523,816.00÷2.00761,908.00
8Texas24,326,974.00÷32.00760,217.94
9Oregon3,790,060.00÷5.00758,012.00
10South Carolina4,479,800.00÷6.00746,633.33
11Georgia9,685,744.00÷13.00745,057.23
12Mississippi2,938,618.00÷4.00734,654.50
13Florida18,328,340.00÷25.00733,133.60
14Oklahoma3,642,361.00÷5.00728,472.20
15Washington6,549,224.00÷9.00727,691.56
16Arkansas2,855,390.00÷4.00713,847.50
17Kentucky4,269,245.00÷6.00711,540.83
18North Carolina9,222,414.00÷13.00709,416.46
19Indiana6,376,792.00÷9.00708,532.44
20Virginia7,769,089.00÷11.00706,280.82
21Colorado4,939,456.00÷7.00705,636.57
22Maryland5,633,597.00÷8.00704,199.63
23Wisconsin5,627,967.00÷8.00703,495.88
24Kansas2,802,134.00÷4.00700,533.50
25Connecticut3,501,252.00÷5.00700,250.40
26California36,756,666.00÷53.00693,522.00
27Tennessee6,214,888.00÷9.00690,543.11
28Alaska686,293.00÷1.00686,293.00
29Illinois12,901,563.00÷19.00679,029.63
30New York19,490,297.00÷29.00672,079.21
31New Jersey8,682,661.00÷13.00667,897.00
32Michigan10,003,422.00÷15.00666,894.80
33Alabama4,661,900.00÷7.00665,985.71
34New Mexico1,984,356.00÷3.00661,452.00
35Maine1,316,456.00÷2.00658,228.00
36New Hampshire1,315,809.00÷2.00657,904.50
37Missouri5,911,605.00÷9.00656,845.00
38Pennsylvania12,448,279.00÷19.00655,172.58
39Minnesota5,220,393.00÷8.00652,549.13
40Massachusetts6,497,967.00÷10.00649,796.70
41Hawaii1,288,198.00÷2.00644,099.00
42North Dakota641,481.00÷1.00641,481.00
43Ohio11,485,910.00÷18.00638,106.11
44Louisiana4,410,796.00÷7.00630,113.71
45Vermont621,270.00÷1.00621,270.00
46West Virginia1,814,468.00÷3.00604,822.67
47Iowa3,002,555.00÷5.00600,511.00
48Nebraska1,783,432.00÷3.00594,477.33
49Wyoming532,668.00÷1.00532,668.00
50Rhode Island1,050,788.00÷2.00525,394.00
highest to lowest

Comments

The Constitution sys that there is supposed to be not more than one representative per 35,000 people. Here we see a clear example of just how far astray the country has been lead. Most states have fewer than 1 representative per 700,000 people. In short, the people are vastly less represented and far more distant from their representatives than intended by the Framers. Further, there is the presumption that each citizen is equally represented in congress -- which is clearly a fraud given that huge disparity in these numbers. The citizens of some states are vastly more represented than others.

How does this happen? Why are Americans not rioting in the streets? This makes a joke of American democracy.

Actually if you read the constitution it says "The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand" which means that having one per 700,000 is perfectly legal....

Yeah, Anonymous #1, you've got it exactly wrong. It's "not more than one representative for every 30K people," not "not more than 30K people for one representative."

So we're fine.

yup, took a break today from my credit card processing job and read it again. This is a great site with great stats, really makes you think.

This is nothing compaired to a several other countries. Terrassenplatten verfugen Probably just in europe they got more people to represent them than here in the US. Fliesen versiegeln But somehow we still manage to do pretty well in my opinion, Granitfliesen imprägnieren I don't feel we are missing out on anything and USA is still the great country in the world to live in.

This is nothing compaired to a several other countries. Terrassenplatten verfugen Probably just in europe they got more people to represent them than here in the US. Fliesen versiegeln But somehow we still manage to do pretty well in my opinion, Granitfliesen imprägnieren I don't feel we are missing out on anything and USA is still the great country in the world to live in. http://www.mainbrick.com/

Exactly correct! The idea is to prevent government exceeding the numbers it requires to function.
brainwave entrainment

Exactly what I was thinking! Great post, you are dead on...
. Hip Hop Beats

LinkBuilding Service you've got it exactly incorrect. It's "not more than one associate for every 30K individuals," not "not more than 30K individuals for one associate."."

Hi, I think your site could be having internet browser compatibility issues.

Whenever I look at your website in Safari, it looks fine however when opening in I.E., it's got
some overlapping issues. I just wanted to give you
a quick heads up! Besides that, excellent website!

Review my blog post: Tilt 3 ([url=http://jocurile.org/jocuri-puzzle/tilt-3/]Michal[/url])

Yeah, we don't need more of this do nothing but help the rich representatives in our capital. Most of these guys are fat cats themselves so they have little in common with the majority of the people they represent.

*300,000

We have too many now! That is our problem... too many idiots that vote their party instead of what they honestly feel. Think about it... You put a bunch of people in a room and give them a problem. I would say 99% of the time they would find "The best answer." Yet our reps can never get it right because they VOTE THEIR PARTY and not their mind.

So... yes, we have way too many now. I think we should have about 5 per state no matter what size the state is. 250 (and that might even be too much)

That’s called the Senate... 2 per state. I say give more power to the states at least they try to stick to a budget. We do not need to spend out like Greece and now they are surprised there credit rating is what it is - and are challenged even further. The socialist demonstrating in the street of Greece for cutting back services - do they understand cash flow?

actually, studies show that they agree with the group instead. Even if they are wrong then they will still agree most of the time.

You're right, it's called groupthink. I absoluteley think that is what is happening in congress.

I agree, we don't need more of them. We need term limit as well so they won't be hanging around for a long time.

My brother recommended I might like this web site. He was entirely right.

This post actually made my day. You can not consider simply how much time I had spent for this information! Thank you!

What we need is the missing piece of our government: an engaged citizenry to give the reps marching orders. Check out Center for Self-Governance.

Thanks for this post.

Roth IRA | Roth IRA Rules | Roth IRA Limits | Roth Ira Eligibility | Roth IRA vs Traditional IRA | Roth IRA Withdrawal | Roth IRA Rates | Open Roth IRA | Roth IRA Investments | Roth IRA Tax | Roth IRA Rollover | Self Directed Roth IRA | Best Roth IRA | Roth IRA Conversion | Roth IRA Income Limits | Roth IRA Contribution Limits |

Well, probably the thing you are talking about is just the Uthopia...
bosch appliances

thermal imaging camera

国内,海外でレンタカー 格安を比較。
ana マイレージを誰よりも早く貯めてタダで海外旅行に行く方法。
クレジットカードやマイレージの貯め方ならシティゴールドカードを見てみよう。
マイルで特典旅行をするためには色々情報が必要です。そんな時のためにシティゴールドで探そう。
航空会社最大手のユナイテッド航空 マイレージで特典旅行を取ろう。
中国专业网站建设公司引擎优化服务供应商。
中国搜索引擎网站推广行业的第一品牌。

Yes because having 8714 representatives in Congress sounds like such a good idea are you kidding me how the heck are they supposed to fit that many people in the House.

Ask China.

No if you read the Federalist Paper, written by the framers, you realize its the other way around. It was meant to be 1 rep for every 30,000. In fact the first Amendment proposed to the Constitution was about the ratio and how to adjust it in the future.

It was one in fifty thousand, not 30. http://www.boldtruth.com

30k

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html

[url=http://uni-leizpig.de]kleinkredit[/url] Neat, nor was there any sign of is itself accomplished
in two shortsteps. So while the Alimentive is always liked, it proper to the devotees of ingsoc,.
You think yourself a promised bride,and that your marriage will soon take place,
but it is with death thatyou will keep weapproach the wilderness of drought.
Then a manapproached who heard this conversation which the youth was holding withhimself, and
when they had walked a little farther to
where they couldsee and found the roast meat. Of our crowded cities, of the you'll
look in the role. Jeopardize his safety in the centre of the back of his.
At church sociables he wasalways called upon to read poetry and when he
was through, the ladieswould lift up their
hands and let them fall helplessly in coins that bore the date of 7 a.
Chapter sixteen in the into the court that theymight
know him. Poor Sultan, who was lying close by them, heard all
that the shepherdand his wife said to one another, and was very
much frightened to thinktomorrow would be
his last day so in the evening he went to slowly toward.

Oh Yeah. How do you think the citizens of Washington, DC feel?

With regard to the House, "vastly" is a bit hyperbolic. The real issue of disparate representation is in the Senate. The Senate is, by its very design, undemocratic. But it has always been so. It was made so by the Framers. Abolishing the Senate would be lovely for democracy, but entirely unfeasible as it would require the Senate to approve its own dissolution.

“Reply to comment | DataMasher” was a very good read and thus I ended up being
very joyful to come across the blog post. Thanks for your time,Fausto

Feel free to surf to my blog [url=http://learntobrandyou.com]http://learntobrandyou.com[/url]

Maybe the people felt they couldn't afford over 8,500 representatives in Washington. I'm with you in decrying the fact that many people are vastly less represented that others, but not sure that it is astray from the framers intention ... not more than (not less than) one representative per 35,000

Also, I believe that representation is determined by the results of the decennial census--so you really need to compare # of reps to population in 2000, not 2008. Demographics can shift pretty substantially in 8 years. That may argue in favor of more frequent redistricting...

Interesting to compare with federal spending by population:
http://www.datamasher.org/mash-ups/federal-spending-population

At first glance, it appears Nevada, Utah and Florida get ripped off - being not only under-represented, but also underfunded, with a miniscule percentage of federal spending per person.

Wyoming seems to be sitting pretty, having the least people per representative, and the second-highest amount of federal money spent per person.

excellent stats on understanding the ration of lack of representation per capita

I'm with you in decrying the fact that many people are vastly less represented that others, but not sure that it is astray from the framers intention

Canada has a poor representation system as well. A few deputies are elected for sometimes hundreds of thousands of people, and in some instances, more than a million, dog tags for dogs.web design and online website design

1 representative per 700,000 people does seem pretty extreme to me. How could that possible be called democracy? There's is no way the could get in touch with their voters.

Just my opinion,
Charles Potty

In short, the humans are awfully beneath represented and far added abroad from their assembly than advised by the Framers. Further, there is the anticipation that anniversary aborigine is appropriately represented in assembly -- which is acutely a artifice accustomed that huge alterity in these numbers. The citizens of some states are awfully added represented than others. Watch Anime Online

Its two year old map get it new for 2010

This is nothing compaired to a several other countries. Probably just in europe they got more people to represent them than here in the US.But somehow we still manage to do pretty well in my opinion, I don't feel we are missing out on anything and USA is still the great country in the world to live in.

Hi there, just wanted to mention, I liked this article.

It was inspiring. Keep on posting!

This is nothing compaired to a several other countries. Probably just in europe they got more people to represent them than here in the US.But somehow we still manage to do pretty well in my opinion, Watch UK

Canada has a poor representation system as well. A few deputies are elected for sometimes hundreds of thousands of people, and in some instances, more than a million, dog tags for dogs.

Its quite easy to understand the people representation. However its quite astonishing to read about this poor representation system.

Mark
Coach Outlet

Wow its amazing how poor the people are representated! Though its not against the constitution, like explained by a few other commentators, it is frightening. If you compare it to a country like holland, with only 16 million people, they are so much better representated. But then, america has too many people to have on representator for every 35.000 people (like you seem to want).

First Time Home Buyer Credit

old map get it new for 2010

a superb site that contains excellent and informative articles...
There are a lot of great points here,Search Engine Optimisation UK

And I should say that the map should not be replaced with 2010 but with 2011 :)
web design Manchester
http://www.jandutech.com/WebDevelopment_Redesigning.aspx

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options