Federal Spending by Population
Federal spending by state (total) divided by Population: Census 2008
Categories:
| Rank | Region | Federal spending by state (total) | ÷ | Population: Census 2008 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | District of Columbia | 11,945,674.00 | ÷ | 591,833.00 | 20.18 |
| 2 | Wyoming | 2,334,042.00 | ÷ | 532,668.00 | 4.38 |
| 3 | Alaska | 2,604,108.00 | ÷ | 686,293.00 | 3.79 |
| 4 | Louisiana | 12,457,325.00 | ÷ | 4,410,796.00 | 2.82 |
| 5 | New Mexico | 5,381,416.00 | ÷ | 1,984,356.00 | 2.71 |
| 6 | Mississippi | 7,483,659.00 | ÷ | 2,938,618.00 | 2.55 |
| 7 | Vermont | 1,440,726.00 | ÷ | 621,270.00 | 2.32 |
| 8 | New York | 44,453,782.00 | ÷ | 19,490,297.00 | 2.28 |
| 9 | North Dakota | 1,402,244.00 | ÷ | 641,481.00 | 2.19 |
| 10 | Montana | 2,108,866.00 | ÷ | 967,440.00 | 2.18 |
| 11 | Maine | 2,695,204.00 | ÷ | 1,316,456.00 | 2.05 |
| 12 | West Virginia | 3,557,356.00 | ÷ | 1,814,468.00 | 1.96 |
| 13 | Rhode Island | 2,037,330.00 | ÷ | 1,050,788.00 | 1.94 |
| 14 | South Dakota | 1,473,420.00 | ÷ | 804,194.00 | 1.83 |
| 15 | Idaho | 2,688,014.00 | ÷ | 1,523,816.00 | 1.76 |
| 16 | Massachusetts | 11,402,443.00 | ÷ | 6,497,967.00 | 1.75 |
| 17 | Arkansas | 4,733,136.00 | ÷ | 2,855,390.00 | 1.66 |
| 18 | Hawaii | 2,119,718.00 | ÷ | 1,288,198.00 | 1.65 |
| 19 | Oklahoma | 5,922,100.00 | ÷ | 3,642,361.00 | 1.63 |
| 20 | Kentucky | 6,866,588.00 | ÷ | 4,269,245.00 | 1.61 |
| 21 | Delaware | 1,363,248.00 | ÷ | 873,092.00 | 1.56 |
| 22 | Arizona | 9,939,803.00 | ÷ | 6,500,180.00 | 1.53 |
| 23 | Pennsylvania | 18,831,865.00 | ÷ | 12,448,279.00 | 1.51 |
| 24 | Connecticut | 5,278,569.00 | ÷ | 3,501,252.00 | 1.51 |
| 25 | Alabama | 6,994,478.00 | ÷ | 4,661,900.00 | 1.50 |
| 26 | Tennessee | 9,200,978.00 | ÷ | 6,214,888.00 | 1.48 |
| 27 | California | 53,818,106.00 | ÷ | 36,756,666.00 | 1.46 |
| 28 | Oregon | 5,498,456.00 | ÷ | 3,790,060.00 | 1.45 |
| 29 | Minnesota | 7,532,966.00 | ÷ | 5,220,393.00 | 1.44 |
| 30 | Missouri | 8,272,929.00 | ÷ | 5,911,605.00 | 1.40 |
| 31 | North Carolina | 12,905,638.00 | ÷ | 9,222,414.00 | 1.40 |
| 32 | Nebraska | 2,439,146.00 | ÷ | 1,783,432.00 | 1.37 |
| 33 | Michigan | 13,587,329.00 | ÷ | 10,003,422.00 | 1.36 |
| 34 | South Carolina | 6,034,593.00 | ÷ | 4,479,800.00 | 1.35 |
| 35 | Iowa | 4,014,269.00 | ÷ | 3,002,555.00 | 1.34 |
| 36 | New Jersey | 11,579,543.00 | ÷ | 8,682,661.00 | 1.33 |
| 37 | Maryland | 7,472,883.00 | ÷ | 5,633,597.00 | 1.33 |
| 38 | Ohio | 15,229,949.00 | ÷ | 11,485,910.00 | 1.33 |
| 39 | Washington | 8,668,016.00 | ÷ | 6,549,224.00 | 1.32 |
| 40 | Indiana | 8,272,302.00 | ÷ | 6,376,792.00 | 1.30 |
| 41 | New Hampshire | 1,691,952.00 | ÷ | 1,315,809.00 | 1.29 |
| 42 | Illinois | 16,266,650.00 | ÷ | 12,901,563.00 | 1.26 |
| 43 | Texas | 30,579,994.00 | ÷ | 24,326,974.00 | 1.26 |
| 44 | Kansas | 3,514,429.00 | ÷ | 2,802,134.00 | 1.25 |
| 45 | Wisconsin | 6,999,599.00 | ÷ | 5,627,967.00 | 1.24 |
| 46 | Utah | 3,159,668.00 | ÷ | 2,736,424.00 | 1.15 |
| 47 | Florida | 20,658,623.00 | ÷ | 18,328,340.00 | 1.13 |
| 48 | Georgia | 10,674,545.00 | ÷ | 9,685,744.00 | 1.10 |
| 49 | Colorado | 5,320,782.00 | ÷ | 4,939,456.00 | 1.08 |
| 50 | Virginia | 7,723,690.00 | ÷ | 7,769,089.00 | 0.99 |
| 51 | Nevada | 2,449,622.00 | ÷ | 2,600,167.00 | 0.94 |
Ready? 1,570 Mashups and counting!
Create a Mashup
Not registered? It's cool.
Register Here
Not enough data? Suggest some more!
Suggest a Data Set
Need something more statistically rigorous?
Analyze This!
Related Mashups
Federal spending by state (total)
divided by
# of US Representatives
sameerb
20 weeks 6 days ago
Number of births
divided by
Population: Census 2008
SamAllgood
22 weeks 5 days ago
State Energy Expenditures
divided by
Population: Census 2008
mark lessans
17 weeks 4 days ago
Federal spending by state (total)
divided by
State Land Area (square miles)
nbucknor
20 weeks 2 days ago
Refugee Arrivals 2008
divided by
Population: Census 2008
dwhite012
6 weeks 5 days ago
- 1 of 37
- ››
Comments
Wow ... DC received almost 5 times as much per capita as the next highest, Wyoming. I guess our representatives want to live in comfort.
Too bad DC'ers don't actually have any representation in the government.
dc recieves that much because congress is in charge of the dc budget not because our congress people are greedy
Post new comment